[squeak-dev] fonts, characterscanners and dead primitive 103
Levente Uzonyi
leves at elte.hu
Wed Sep 4 13:35:19 UTC 2013
On Tue, 3 Sep 2013, Casey Ransberger wrote:
> I'm not sure what the deal here is. It's native OS fonts, I think, and also something that hasn't come up to my recollection since Juan gave us a much-nicer-than-we-had (anti-aliased) font from Cuis.
I didn't really follow recent changes to Cuis, but AFAIK it only supports
byte characters, so those fonts only contain some latin characters
(Latin-9 maybe).
Levente
>
> I'd like to see us depend less on host facilities now that we have the Cogs, so I'm biased, but I'd say: go ahead and break it if no one is raising an objection.
>
> Is this related to the Scratch work, out of curiosity?
>
> On Sep 3, 2013, at 6:21 PM, tim Rowledge <tim at rowledge.org> wrote:
>
>>
>> On 02-09-2013, at 12:45 PM, tim Rowledge <tim at rowledge.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Who, if anyone, is maintaining the FreeType package? Who, if anyone, is using it? It has some rather old methods that nastily over-ride more recent methods in the trunk image. That implies it is moribund to me.
>>
>> Well it certainly sounds like nobody cares about FreeType. I guess that means nobody will mind as I rewrite some of the low-level font/scanner code and almost certainly break FreeType.
>>
>>
>> tim
>> --
>> tim Rowledge; tim at rowledge.org; http://www.rowledge.org/tim
>> Useful random insult:- Not much to show for four billion years of evolution.
>>
>>
>>
>
>
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|