On 4/9/14, 9:18 AM, "David T. Lewis" <lewis at mail.msen.com> wrote:

> The Cuis approach is interesting, but we do not need *more* ways to find
> loadable packages. I have tried the Cuis approach (I put OSProcess into
> a package for Cuis).


Where I found OSProcess  and CommandShell for Cuis?

>It is a good idea with some advantages, but it would
> not be helpful as a "Squeak map catalog" because it relies on active package
> maintainers who are participating in the development process.


Many packages work in 4.5 , but not listed as such in SqueakMap.

Edgar