On 09-04-2014, at 11:37 AM, Chris Muller <asqueaker at gmail.com> wrote:
> Again, assuming all the proxy-bugs fixed, what more could one want in
> terms of meeting all the demands we want as developers?
> 

Wasn’t criticising what you did because I don’t know what you did - merely allowing that Colin might know of some problem in your approach. Thus the "I’d say the real problem would likely be the ancestry code” bit.

I agree about what is wanted (except I’d like to know how we could get rid of the other 2500 version-thingies as well) and the proxy problems.

tim
--
tim Rowledge; tim at rowledge.org; http://www.rowledge.org/tim
There are no stupid questions. But, there are a lot of inquisitive idiots.