[squeak-dev] IdentitySet>>collect:
Chris Muller
asqueaker at gmail.com
Mon Dec 1 16:38:25 UTC 2014
On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 10:29 AM, Eliot Miranda <eliot.miranda at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 2:35 AM, Bert Freudenberg <bert at freudenbergs.de>
> wrote:
>>
>> On 01.12.2014, at 07:35, Colin Putney <colin at wiresong.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Nov 30, 2014 at 6:20 AM, Bert Freudenberg <bert at freudenbergs.de>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> How would you define “type” here? Same class?
>>
>>
>> Yes, same class. It might be reasonable to answer instances of analogous
>> classes for weak collections, and expect the caller to use #collect:as: if
>> they want to retain weakness.
>>
>> Colin
>>
>>
>> That’s certainly simple:
>>
>> “collect: returns a collection of the same class as the receiver, except
>> for weak collections, which answer non-weak equivalents. To return a
>> collection of a different class, use collect:as:"
>
>
> except collect: can't possibly do this for Interval. IMO, reify the idea of
Not only that, but the "except for weak collections" is a totally
arbitrary exception, because the collected objects may or may not be
referenced from elsewhere.
> species in the comments for collect: and species and say that collect:
> answers something of the same species. The idea being that species is the
> same as class when the receiver is a mutable collection, but some other
> suitable class when it doesn't.
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|