[squeak-dev] re: Does Monticello try to install shared pools before methods using them?

Chris Muller asqueaker at gmail.com
Tue Dec 9 20:36:24 UTC 2014

On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 8:02 AM, Craig Latta <craig at netjam.org> wrote:
>> Do your pool references end up being valid?
>      Aha, the answer is no. So, I had to put some things in a separate
> package which must be loaded first. Among those things is a change
> required by a remote-object-aware version of
> IdentityDictionary>>scanFor:; the system was crashing when they were
> loaded in the wrong order.

Interesting.  What did you have to do to #scanFor:, some kind of proxy
detection or something?

PS -- I agree with Eliot that MC _should_ handle compiling subclasses
of SharedPool first.  I thought it did..

More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list