Existing projects on squeaksource.com are fully functional, and the
earlier reliability problems have been addressed (knock wood). In
particular, the loss of data that we previous were experiencing is not
happening now.

As a matter of policy (governed by the Squeak board), creation of new
projects is not permitted. But all other functions should be be working.

I don't know what the policy should be with respect to Andreas'
repositories, other than to say the we should act in ways that Andreas
would have wanted us to act. If we are not sure what that is, then copying
the repository to SS3 and starting fresh from that point is probably the
right thing to do.

Dave

> On Thu, 13 Feb 2014, Göran Krampe wrote:
>
>> Hi guys!
>>
>> Ok, so while messing with SqueakSSL I note that Andreas has a bunch of
>> projects on SS, of which only he is admin AFAICT. SqueakSSL and
>> WebClient may
>> be of strongest interest I guess.
>>
>> There is a WebClient on SS3 too (haven't checked if it has additions),
>> but
>> AFAIK neither of these two are on Smalltalkhub.
>>
>> So... I was wondering if we should:
>>
>> - Just gain access to the repos on SS (but SS...)
>> - Just copy over into a new repo on StHub or SS3
>> - Delete old repo or just let it be and potentially confusing people?
>>
>>
>> What do you think?
>>
>> ...and btw, adding notes on Projects on SS that they are dead and
>> pointing to
>> StHub was a good idea BUT... my notes are gone. Probably due to SS
>> restarted
>> and losing data. Hmmm, I think I will delete my old projects simply.
>
> Not all projects are dead on squeaksource.com. If you don't plan to update
> your projects there, then add a pointer to the new repository. Deleting
> the projects will not help at all.
>
> The following messages describe why your notes were removed:
> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/2013-November/174578.html
> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/2013-December/174950.html
>
>
> Levente
>
>>
>> regards, Göran
>>
>>
>>
>