Hi Tansel,

it is hard to estimate the concrete effort for porting these tools to other Smalltalk dialects. 
The framework has several dependencies to other libraries, tools, and makes extensive 
use of meta-programming. I think as closer the dialect is to Squeak as easier it should be. 
Nevertheless, all concepts and ideas are independent of Squeak/Smalltalk and can also 
be adapted to other OOP languages. That means, there should be no showstopper that 
prevents Path tools to work in another environment. For example, a current master thesis 
of our group deals with porting these tools to Eclipse/Java on the basis of a common 
meta-model and it works very well.

Best regards,
Michael

On 23.02.2014, at 23:56, Tansel Ersavas <tansel at tansel.org> wrote:

> Congratulations, It looks like a major advancement to software development process!
> 
> How difficult would it be to convert to other dialects?
> 
> Tansel
> 
> 
> On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 4:42 AM, tim Rowledge <tim at rowledge.org> wrote:
> So I can ‘nur’ programs at last? Fabulous; I really could have done with that ability last week...
> 
> tim
> --
> tim Rowledge; tim at rowledge.org; http://www.rowledge.org/tim
> "Today's subliminal thought is:"
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

---
Dr.-Ing. Michael Perscheid
michaelperscheid at googlemail.com

http://www.michaelperscheid.de/