2014-06-06 17:55 GMT+02:00 Nicolas Cellier <
nicolas.cellier.aka.nice at gmail.com>:

>
>
>
> 2014-06-06 12:43 GMT+02:00 Nicolas Cellier <
> nicolas.cellier.aka.nice at gmail.com>:
>
>
>>
>> 2014-06-06 4:48 GMT+02:00 David T. Lewis <lewis at mail.msen.com>:
>>
>> The change behaves as described, fixing testHandlerFromAction and
>>> introducing
>>> the (now expected) failure into testHandlerRentrancy.
>>>
>>> I am not qualified to offer any more useful critique other than to say
>>> that
>>> is clear that Nicolas has put some serious thought into this issue and I
>>> hope that others will take a close look at it.
>>>
>>> Dave
>>>
>>>
>> Thanks David,
>> Added wisdom: googling about usage of #rearmHandlerDuring: it seems
>> required by Island mechanism in Tweak see
>> https://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=2519
>>
>> Maybe there is another implementation possible in Tweak, but that's
>> definitely the main usage of #rearmHandlerDuring:
>>
>> I also see this hack in VMMaker:
>> http://forum.world.st/VM-Maker-VMMaker-oscog-eem-180-mcz-td4637135.html
>> found after this thread:
>> http://web.archiveorange.com/archive/v/kLJIkmCV2lbVUoHLbp3R
>>
>> I'll try and give a try to above Eliot's snippets
>>
>>
>>
> And good news, the new implementation of rearmHandlerDuring: is still work
> on Eliot's snippets (#caught is correctly transcripted 5 times).
> Though the count of second snippet is still 1
>

Nah! The count is not 1 when the outer handler is rearmed.
The count is 6 (1 initial ProgressInitiationException + 5 inner
Notification).
The return value is 1 (it is the value returned by 1 to: 5 do: ...), and
that's what abused me.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20140609/9bfe68db/attachment.html