[squeak-dev] Re: [Seaside] Kom or Swazoo?

Chris Muller ma.chris.m at gmail.com
Fri Jun 13 01:21:50 UTC 2014


Well, I guess Seaside requires OmniBrowser anyway, doesn't it?

On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 5:35 PM, John McKeon <p3anoman at gmail.com> wrote:
> Andreas' WebClient works quite well in Squeak also. There is a configuration
> for it somewhere as well.
> The only problem it has is that WebClient-Seaside has code in it that
> refernces the OmniBrowser based Seaside control panel. Moving the one
> offending class to another package would fix that. I would do it if i had
> rights to the repo...
>
> John
>
>
> On Thursday, June 12, 2014, Chris Muller <asqueaker at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Installing Seaside 3.1.1 into Squeak does not install a necessary
>> WAServerAdaptor subclass.
>>
>> Zinc is Pharo only right?  So I guess my choices are Kom or Swazoo?  I
>>
>> need to research how to install either but does anyone know whether
>> either has an inherent advantage over the other?  What are their
>> differences?
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> PS -- During my brief investigation so far I noticed -- of the 7
>> Smalltalk's listed at http://www.seaside.st/download, the only one
>> which is a broken link is Squeak..
>> _______________________________________________
>> seaside mailing list
>> seaside at lists.squeakfoundation.org
>> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside
>
>
>
> --
> jmck.seasidehosting.st


More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list