On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 12:31 PM, Douglas McPherson <djm1329 at san.rr.com>
wrote:

> The pop-up is a result of a failing test in:
>
> CodeHolder>>
> validateMessageSource: sourceString forSelector: aSelector inClass:
> theClass
> "Check whether there is evidence that method source is invalid"
>
> (theClass newParser parseSelector: sourceString asString) = aSelector
> ifFalse: [self informPossiblyCorruptSource].
>
> In my example, the source string is 'ba_z ^true'. However, the result of
> #parseSelector: is #ba but the selector is actually #'ba_z'. So the test
> fails resulting in 'self #informPossiblyCorruptSource'.
>
> However, I can successfully doIt:
> 'Bar new ba_z' ==> true
> meaning that the selector is recognized in this case.
>
> So, Parser>>#parseSelector doesn't understand the underscore, but I'm in
> unfamiliar territory here.
>

fixed in Compiler-eem.284


>
> Doug
>
>
>
> On Jun 26, 2014, at 11:08 , Eliot Miranda wrote:
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 11:05 AM, Eliot Miranda <eliot.miranda at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Doug,
>>
>>     this is going to be either Shout or Text>>makeSelectorBoldIn: that
>> need changes, probably the latter.  The latter probably needs to just
>> accept selectors containing underscores.  Shout would need to obey the
>> preference. HTH
>>
>
> hmmm, this works: 'i_contain_underscores ^self' asText makeSelectorBoldIn:
> UndefinedObject
>
> So can you show a stack trace?  e.g. by replacing the pop-up with a halt?
>
>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 11:19 PM, Douglas McPherson <djm1329 at san.rr.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I want to use underscores in the selectors which define external
>>> functions, to match the external function name as much as possible. So I
>>> checked the preference "allowUnderscoreSelectors". I can define and use
>>> such selectors, however each time I browse a method whose selector has an
>>> underscore, I get the attached modal pop-up:
>>>
>>>  <UserDialogBox.png>
>>>
>>> This seems to happen in both 4.4 and 4.5.
>>>
>>> Is there something else I am supposed to do to properly enable
>>> underscores in selectors?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Doug
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> best,
>> Eliot
>>
>
>
>
> --
> best,
> Eliot
>
>
>
>
>
>


-- 
best,
Eliot
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20140626/b63ebeea/attachment.htm