Yes, but not since 4.1.  :)

On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 5:12 PM, Tobias Pape <Das.Linux at gmx.de> wrote:
>
> On 04.03.2014, at 23:23, Chris Muller <asqueaker at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Tobias,
>>
>>>> Chris, please consider this:
>>>>
>>>> My mail from 02.03.2014, at 23:03,
>>
>> --snip--
>>
>> Yes, sorry, I did consider your mail..  A while ago, in fact.
>>
>>   http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/2014-January/176249.html
>>
>> We did not create new sources since V41 because a couple of us have
>> ideas about what we want that to do.  Eliot has an idea and I,
>> personally, want to avoid "island" releases where each method version
>> is totally alone with no context from its prior version.  I want each
>> release to have the current version for each method, plus the version
>> from the prior release.
>>
>> Sounds like there is some motivation to work on this for 4.6.  We
>> haven't cared about "size" much last few releases but I know it will
>> be a factor in 4.6 or soon thereafter, where we'll address not just
>> .changes but other aspects as well.
>
> Ok, so, when condensing the changes file for the past releases, we lost method
> histories, right?
>
> Best
>         -Tobias
>