[squeak-dev] Re: [Pharo-dev] New Cog VMs available
herbertkoenig at gmx.net
Sun Nov 16 21:59:57 UTC 2014
as I wrote I run an AidaWeb server. Main reason is, that that is running
lots of processes, fiddles with the call stack and I have an automated
test which keeps it busy for several minutes.
Blease (too nice to correct :-) note that I said it seems, because this
is a really shaky kind of benchmark. I only measured the reply times in
Firebug after having made sure that all static content is in the browser
cache. And one should not compare 4.3 image based results with 4.6 image
based results. And Cog was the wrong term,
stklinuxhtARMv6-14.45.3126.tgz was what I used. I assumed it was Cog.....
Basically I was surprised how good the standard VM was performing. For
the whole test (which loads the Pi with about 50% CPU) I got the reverse
result of what I expected. Standard VM fastest, Spur slowest. Just tried
again, same result. No idea why. Standard VM and StackVM ran the same
image. The important result was that a complex application (Webserver +
application model, mostly Ajax updates) ran stable with all VMs.
In the next days I'll run simultaneous users on the Webserver and some
other applications which ran for days or hours on the standard VM
without any crash.
Am 16.11.2014 um 20:20 schrieb tim Rowledge:
> On 16-11-2014, at 6:14 AM, Herbert König <herbertkoenig at gmx.net> wrote:
>> Spur also works and in my case it seems that Spur is about 1.5 times as fast as Cog which seems a bit slower than the original VM that comes with the Pi.
> Now that’s an interesting claim; what tests lead you to that conclusion?
> For me the Stack vm (no actual Cog yet…) runs very slightly faster (under tinyBenchmarks, as a simple example) for bytecodes and 50% or so better for sends. Spur seems similar for bytecodes (surprise!) and maybe 40% better than stackvm for sends. Cog is coming soon…
> tim Rowledge; tim at rowledge.org; http://www.rowledge.org/tim
> Strange OpCodes: RWD: Rewind Disk
More information about the Squeak-dev