Actually, I misread the question and saw what I wanted to see. The question was about build.squeak.org <http://build.squeak.org/> and I thought I saw trunk.squeak.org <http://trunk.squeak.org/>. 
Seems to me that what I’m saying about trunk.squeak.org <http://trunk.squeak.org/> is still true: it has been shut down on its usual subdomain; and, a new process has appeared on box4. 
Looks to me like trunk development is halted for the moment. 

Chris 

> On Oct 14, 2014, at 8:52 PM, David T. Lewis <lewis at mail.msen.com> wrote:
> 
>> On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 08:37:56PM -0400, Chris Cunnington wrote:
>>> On Oct 14, 2014, at 8:14 PM, Dale Henrichs <dale.henrichs at gemtalksystems.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Getting a 503 at the moment ...
>> 
>> Yes. I noticed this morning that Chris Muller has started a new SS process
>> on box4. And the usual address [1] is routing to the default when there is
>> no service on box2. I conclude that he is moving SS to box4 and is in-between
>> boxes. I would imagine that the process on box4 needs to be announced by
>> routing the dns on box2 to its new location [2].
>> 
> 
> No this is nothing to do with anything on box4. The build.squeak.org service
> is on box3 along with squeaksource.com. Squeaksource is fine, but Jenkins is
> not. There are currently about 30 Squeak VMs of various flavors running under
> the Jenkins uid. Ick. I'll try to restart the Jenkins service and see if I can
> clear out the mess.
> 
> Dave
> 
> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20141014/a5a61f19/attachment.htm