[squeak-dev] Adding WebClient and SqueakSSL to Trunk?

Tobias Pape Das.Linux at gmx.de
Mon Apr 6 19:22:48 UTC 2015


Hi Levente

On 06.04.2015, at 20:43, Levente Uzonyi <leves at elte.hu> wrote:

> It would be better for these packages too, because they would get more
> attention.
> The SqueakSSL/WebClient changes I made in October[1] are still missing from the official repositories.
> 
> Levente
> 
> [1] http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/2014-October/180251.html
> 

I just now saw that there is more than just vm stuff.

The problem with WebClient and SqueakSSL as of now is, that
its maintenance-ship is, well, complicated. I went forth and
pushed tiny changes to WebClient by just being somewhat on 
my own initiative[1].

===========

Dear Squeak Community as a whole and dear Ron as person possibly 
best fit to make a decision on this:

	Should we put the maintainer-ship of WebClient and
	SqueakSSL into the hands of the Squeak Core Team?


===========

Best
	-Tobias




[1]: There's a saying, initiative is discipline-lessness with positive outcome

> On Mon, 6 Apr 2015, Tobias Pape wrote:
> 
>> 
>> On 06.04.2015, at 18:59, David T. Lewis <lewis at mail.msen.com> wrote:
>> 
>>>> On Sun, Apr 5, 2015 at 10:26 AM, Marcel Taeumel
>>>> <marcel.taeumel at student.hpi.uni-potsdam.de> wrote:
>>>>> Hey! :)
>>>>> 
>>>>> Can we add both to the update map (somehow?) and see if it works out
>>>>> during
>>>>> the following days/weeks until the release?
>>>> 
>>>> +1
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> What is the point of moving these into the base image? Aren't these
>>> exactly the kinds of things that you would want to have maintained as
>>> independent packages that can be easily loaded from SqueakMap?
>> 
>> I think both these are Extremely Important (capital).
>> WebClient as replacement for HTTPSocket (it already provides a compatibility
>> layer; Andreas seemed to always considered WebClient to replace HTTPSocket),
>> and SqueakSSL because you can't load anything meaningful on the web without
>> SSL; github, twitter, most sites. And that's good.
>> Plus we _finally_ could put the Plain Text Passwords for Monticello behind
>> SSL…
>> 
>> Best
>> 	-Tobias




More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list