[squeak-dev] Adding WebClient and SqueakSSL to Trunk?
Tobias Pape
Das.Linux at gmx.de
Mon Apr 6 19:22:48 UTC 2015
Hi Levente
On 06.04.2015, at 20:43, Levente Uzonyi <leves at elte.hu> wrote:
> It would be better for these packages too, because they would get more
> attention.
> The SqueakSSL/WebClient changes I made in October[1] are still missing from the official repositories.
>
> Levente
>
> [1] http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/2014-October/180251.html
>
I just now saw that there is more than just vm stuff.
The problem with WebClient and SqueakSSL as of now is, that
its maintenance-ship is, well, complicated. I went forth and
pushed tiny changes to WebClient by just being somewhat on
my own initiative[1].
===========
Dear Squeak Community as a whole and dear Ron as person possibly
best fit to make a decision on this:
Should we put the maintainer-ship of WebClient and
SqueakSSL into the hands of the Squeak Core Team?
===========
Best
-Tobias
[1]: There's a saying, initiative is discipline-lessness with positive outcome
> On Mon, 6 Apr 2015, Tobias Pape wrote:
>
>>
>> On 06.04.2015, at 18:59, David T. Lewis <lewis at mail.msen.com> wrote:
>>
>>>> On Sun, Apr 5, 2015 at 10:26 AM, Marcel Taeumel
>>>> <marcel.taeumel at student.hpi.uni-potsdam.de> wrote:
>>>>> Hey! :)
>>>>>
>>>>> Can we add both to the update map (somehow?) and see if it works out
>>>>> during
>>>>> the following days/weeks until the release?
>>>>
>>>> +1
>>>>
>>>
>>> What is the point of moving these into the base image? Aren't these
>>> exactly the kinds of things that you would want to have maintained as
>>> independent packages that can be easily loaded from SqueakMap?
>>
>> I think both these are Extremely Important (capital).
>> WebClient as replacement for HTTPSocket (it already provides a compatibility
>> layer; Andreas seemed to always considered WebClient to replace HTTPSocket),
>> and SqueakSSL because you can't load anything meaningful on the web without
>> SSL; github, twitter, most sites. And that's good.
>> Plus we _finally_ could put the Plain Text Passwords for Monticello behind
>> SSL…
>>
>> Best
>> -Tobias
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|