[squeak-dev] Adding WebClient and SqueakSSL to Trunk?
Levente Uzonyi
leves at elte.hu
Tue Apr 21 04:25:54 UTC 2015
I see you've fixed those too. I'd still remove the WebClient-HTTP package,
and add these methods to the Network package.
Levente
On Tue, 21 Apr 2015, Levente Uzonyi wrote:
> I'm a bit too late here, but I wouldn't have pushed WebClient-HTTP, because
> those are only overrides, and 2 methods do not work from those.
>
> Levente
>
> On Mon, 20 Apr 2015, Tobias Pape wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 14.04.2015, at 14:18, karl ramberg <karlramberg at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> We should pull these in to trunk as soon as possible so we can get stuff
>>> tested before the release of a new image.
>>>
>>> Can you do that Levente, as you seem most familiar with the changes you
>>> made ?
>>>
>>
>> Although I am not levente I went ahead and pushed SqueakSSL and WebClient
>> into
>> the trunk. Lets see how it turns out.
>>
>> Best
>> -Tobias
>>
>>> Karl
>>>
>>> On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 9:22 PM, Tobias Pape <Das.Linux at gmx.de> wrote:
>>> Hi Levente
>>>
>>> On 06.04.2015, at 20:43, Levente Uzonyi <leves at elte.hu> wrote:
>>>
>>>> It would be better for these packages too, because they would get more
>>>> attention.
>>>> The SqueakSSL/WebClient changes I made in October[1] are still missing
>>>> from the official repositories.
>>>>
>>>> Levente
>>>>
>>>> [1]
>>>> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/2014-October/180251.html
>>>>
>>>
>>> I just now saw that there is more than just vm stuff.
>>>
>>> The problem with WebClient and SqueakSSL as of now is, that
>>> its maintenance-ship is, well, complicated. I went forth and
>>> pushed tiny changes to WebClient by just being somewhat on
>>> my own initiative[1].
>>>
>>> ===========
>>>
>>> Dear Squeak Community as a whole and dear Ron as person possibly
>>> best fit to make a decision on this:
>>>
>>> Should we put the maintainer-ship of WebClient and
>>> SqueakSSL into the hands of the Squeak Core Team?
>>>
>>>
>>> ===========
>>>
>>> Best
>>> -Tobias
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> [1]: There's a saying, initiative is discipline-lessness with positive
>>> outcome
>>>
>>>> On Mon, 6 Apr 2015, Tobias Pape wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 06.04.2015, at 18:59, David T. Lewis <lewis at mail.msen.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Sun, Apr 5, 2015 at 10:26 AM, Marcel Taeumel
>>>>>>> <marcel.taeumel at student.hpi.uni-potsdam.de> wrote:
>>>>>>>> Hey! :)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Can we add both to the update map (somehow?) and see if it works out
>>>>>>>> during
>>>>>>>> the following days/weeks until the release?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What is the point of moving these into the base image? Aren't these
>>>>>> exactly the kinds of things that you would want to have maintained as
>>>>>> independent packages that can be easily loaded from SqueakMap?
>>>>>
>>>>> I think both these are Extremely Important (capital).
>>>>> WebClient as replacement for HTTPSocket (it already provides a
>>>>> compatibility
>>>>> layer; Andreas seemed to always considered WebClient to replace
>>>>> HTTPSocket),
>>>>> and SqueakSSL because you can't load anything meaningful on the web
>>>>> without
>>>>> SSL; github, twitter, most sites. And that's good.
>>>>> Plus we _finally_ could put the Plain Text Passwords for Monticello
>>>>> behind
>>>>> SSL…
>>>>>
>>>>> Best
>>>>> -Tobias
>>
>>
>>
>
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|