On 21.04.2015, at 06:25, Levente Uzonyi <leves at elte.hu> wrote:

> I see you've fixed those too. I'd still remove the WebClient-HTTP package, and add these methods to the Network package.
> 

Directly?
Ok, seems fair.
Could you do that?

Best
	-Tobias


> Levente
> 
> On Tue, 21 Apr 2015, Levente Uzonyi wrote:
> 
>> I'm a bit too late here, but I wouldn't have pushed WebClient-HTTP, because those are only overrides, and 2 methods do not work from those.
>> 
>> Levente
>> 
>> On Mon, 20 Apr 2015, Tobias Pape wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi,
>>> On 14.04.2015, at 14:18, karl ramberg <karlramberg at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> We should pull these in to trunk as soon as possible so we can get stuff tested before the release of a new image.
>>>> Can you do that Levente, as you seem most familiar with the changes you made ?
>>> Although I am not levente I went ahead and pushed SqueakSSL and WebClient into
>>> the trunk. Lets see how it turns out.
>>> Best
>>> 	-Tobias
>>>> Karl
>>>> On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 9:22 PM, Tobias Pape <Das.Linux at gmx.de> wrote:
>>>> Hi Levente
>>>> On 06.04.2015, at 20:43, Levente Uzonyi <leves at elte.hu> wrote:
>>>>> It would be better for these packages too, because they would get more
>>>>> attention.
>>>>> The SqueakSSL/WebClient changes I made in October[1] are still missing from the official repositories.
>>>>> Levente
>>>>> [1] http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/2014-October/180251.html
>>>> I just now saw that there is more than just vm stuff.
>>>> The problem with WebClient and SqueakSSL as of now is, that
>>>> its maintenance-ship is, well, complicated. I went forth and
>>>> pushed tiny changes to WebClient by just being somewhat on
>>>> my own initiative[1].
>>>> ===========
>>>> Dear Squeak Community as a whole and dear Ron as person possibly
>>>> best fit to make a decision on this:
>>>> 
>>>>        Should we put the maintainer-ship of WebClient and
>>>>        SqueakSSL into the hands of the Squeak Core Team?
>>>> ===========
>>>> Best
>>>>        -Tobias
>>>> [1]: There's a saying, initiative is discipline-lessness with positive outcome
>>>>> On Mon, 6 Apr 2015, Tobias Pape wrote: