Hi Frank,

SqueakSSL is now on Github at https://github.com/itsmeront/squeakssl/settings 

Who should be added as collaborators?  

Thanks for the nudge!

All the best,

Ron Teitelbaum

-----Original Message-----
From: Ron Teitelbaum [mailto:ron at 3dicc.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2015 10:46 AM
To: 'Frank Shearar'; 'The general-purpose Squeak developers list'
Subject: RE: [squeak-dev] [Box-Admins] FIY: box3 library hack for SqueakSSL

Sorry I missed your conversation.

I'm porting squeakssl over to github now.  I'll let you know when it is done.

All the best,

Ron Teitelbaum
Head Of Engineering
3d Immersive Collaboration Consulting
ron at 3dicc.com
Follow Me On Twitter: @RonTeitelbaum
www.3dicc.com 
https://www.google.com/+3dicc



-----Original Message-----
From: Frank Shearar [mailto:frank.shearar at gmail.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2015 9:40 AM
To: The general-purpose Squeak developers list; Ron Teitelbaum
Subject: Re: [squeak-dev] [Box-Admins] FIY: box3 library hack for SqueakSSL

On 5 April 2015 at 19:37, Tobias Pape <Das.Linux at gmx.de> wrote:
>
> On 05.04.2015, at 11:54, Frank Shearar <frank.shearar at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On 4 April 2015 at 20:23, Tobias Pape <Das.Linux at gmx.de> wrote:
>>> Dear Box-Admins,
>>>
>>> There's a problem on the CI Server regarding libraries.
>>>
>>> Some Jobs need SqueakSSL, which is downloaded from google code and 
>>> made accessible.
>>
>> I freely admit I just hacked something together that didn't 
>> immediately explode. The code in question downloads 
>> https://squeakssl.googlecode.com/files/SqueakSSL-bin-0.1.5.zip
>>
>> Since googlecode.com is going, I guess we should be porting squeakssl 
>> to github as well, right?
>>
>> Ron?
>
> please do

I only feel comfortable about doing this with Ron's feedback - Ron?

frank