[squeak-dev] [Box-Admins] FIY: box3 library hack for SqueakSSL

Frank Shearar frank.shearar at gmail.com
Tue Apr 21 14:57:49 UTC 2015


Ah, cool. To where are you porting it? I'm happy wherever it ends up,
and it doesn't _really_ make sense for it to go under the
squeak-smalltalk organisation, come to think of it.

frank

On 21 April 2015 at 15:46, Ron Teitelbaum <ron at 3dicc.com> wrote:
> Sorry I missed your conversation.
>
> I'm porting squeakssl over to github now.  I'll let you know when it is done.
>
> All the best,
>
> Ron Teitelbaum
> Head Of Engineering
> 3d Immersive Collaboration Consulting
> ron at 3dicc.com
> Follow Me On Twitter: @RonTeitelbaum
> www.3dicc.com
> https://www.google.com/+3dicc
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Frank Shearar [mailto:frank.shearar at gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2015 9:40 AM
> To: The general-purpose Squeak developers list; Ron Teitelbaum
> Subject: Re: [squeak-dev] [Box-Admins] FIY: box3 library hack for SqueakSSL
>
> On 5 April 2015 at 19:37, Tobias Pape <Das.Linux at gmx.de> wrote:
>>
>> On 05.04.2015, at 11:54, Frank Shearar <frank.shearar at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On 4 April 2015 at 20:23, Tobias Pape <Das.Linux at gmx.de> wrote:
>>>> Dear Box-Admins,
>>>>
>>>> There's a problem on the CI Server regarding libraries.
>>>>
>>>> Some Jobs need SqueakSSL, which is downloaded from google code and
>>>> made accessible.
>>>
>>> I freely admit I just hacked something together that didn't
>>> immediately explode. The code in question downloads
>>> https://squeakssl.googlecode.com/files/SqueakSSL-bin-0.1.5.zip
>>>
>>> Since googlecode.com is going, I guess we should be porting squeakssl
>>> to github as well, right?
>>>
>>> Ron?
>>
>> please do
>
> I only feel comfortable about doing this with Ron's feedback - Ron?
>
> frank
>


More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list