The system (SqueakSource) does not provide any way to contact the
original author (no email information), but you said you've already
done that anyway, ("cc'd on this" you said).  Since Ian has not been
visible in the community for a long time, I do not feel I'm being
discourteous.  How long do you want to wait for a reply before
proceeding with further development needed by today's community?


On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 9:58 AM, David T. Lewis <lewis at mail.msen.com> wrote:
> As a matter of protocol and of common courtesy, please ask the author of
> the package how he prefers to handle this.
>
> Dave
>
>> I, too, fixed this a while ago as well as a couple of other
>> improvements.  Since RFB is now needed by the updated SqueakSource
>> package at http://source.squeak.org/ss, and none of the original
>> authors RFB are active in the community, continued development on RFB
>> should continue there.  Please find my improved versions of RFB with
>> that fix there.
>>
>> Levente, what other improvements did you make?  We may want to integrate
>> them?
>>
>>  - Chris
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 7:15 AM, Levente Uzonyi <leves at elte.hu> wrote:
>>> I've fixed this bug a while ago in "my branch", but it has some other
>>> changes which may not be useful for everyone. You can find the latest
>>> version here: http://leves.web.elte.hu/squeak/RFB-ul.11.mcz
>>>
>>> Levente
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sun, 16 Aug 2015, Patrick Shouse wrote:
>>>
>>>> I've fixed a tiny bug in RFBMenuMorph that was causing RFBServer open
>>>> to
>>>> fail
>>>> in an up-to-date Squeak-5.0-All-in-One image. I simply replaced the
>>>> reference to a missing class, EmptyArray, with Array empty. Seems to
>>>> have
>>>> solved the problem. Is there a preferred way to submit this change so
>>>> that
>>>> the repository on SqueakSource gets updated?
>>>>
>>>> 'From Squeak5.0 of 14 August 2015 [latest update: #15135] on 17 August
>>>> 2015
>>>> at 1:25:32 am'!
>>>>
>>>> !RFBMenuMorph methodsFor: 'construction' stamp: 'pls 8/17/2015 00:28'!
>>>> add: label get: getBlock set: setBlock help: helpString
>>>>         "Add a new updating item with the given label and balloon
>>>> helpString.  The
>>>> getBlock provides a Boolean with which the <yes>/<no> prefix for the
>>>> label
>>>> is retrieved.  If the item is selected then setBlock is invoked."
>>>>
>>>>         (self addUpdating: #getLabel: target: setBlock selector: #value
>>>> argumentList: Array empty)
>>>>                 wordingProvider: self
>>>>                 wordingSelector: #getLabel:;
>>>>                 wordingArgument: (Array with: getBlock with: label).
>>>>         self balloonTextForLastItem: helpString! !
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> View this message in context:
>>>> http://forum.world.st/Tiny-patch-for-RFB-tp4843388.html
>>>> Sent from the Squeak - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
>