On 12/18/2015 05:26 PM, Sean P. DeNigris wrote:
> Robert Withers wrote
>> Perhaps I should use technical names and be done with it
> Yes, please! I have used Squeak and Pharo almost every day for 6 years,
> closely following the mailing lists, and still find the buffet of clever
> project names baffling. Unless we're not trying to take over the world with
> a particular project (like maybe Seaside, which could've blown Rails out of
> the water given a little luck), I don't see what we gain in trade giving up
> clarity.
What do you think would make a good name for what I am calling Mushroom, 
which was SqueakElib, but is really the 6th presentation layer above 
what are now SecureSession? It establishes a modified CapTP protocol (no 
searchpath & not all working). It is the presentation layer for 
distributed objects with promise pipelining : messages are sent to 
future results, and distributed result continuations. It's pretty 
neat.   5,   2.  I am not sure what name accurately names this, what it 
does, where it is.

distributed object computer?

>
>
>
> -----
> Cheers,
> Sean
> --
> View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/evolutions-of-squeakelib-crypto-Reed-Solomon-tp4864527p4867855.html
> Sent from the Squeak - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>

-- 
. .. .. ^,^ robert