>>I don't kno how I did this

It's quite easy.  You and Levante worked off of the same ancestor and
committed your work.  The names mean no collision.  (or, just possibly, you
overwrote the number in the title while committing - I've done that, but
usually with a comment instead of a number).

In either case, I could see how it would cause update to be unhappy.  Was
ul's version an ancestor of yours, or are you skipping over it?

On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 10:01 AM, Eliot Miranda <eliot.miranda at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi All,
>
>     I've screwed up and somehow managed to create an update with the same
> number as a previous one.  You'll see in trunk update
>
> update-eem.295.mcm
> update-ul.295.mcm
>
> and in update.spur
>
> update.spur-eem.295.mcm
> update.spur-ul.295.mcm
>
> I don't kno how I did this but can some kind authorised soul rename
> update-eem.295.mcm => update-eem.296.mcm
> update.spur-eem.295.mcm => update.spur-eem.296.mcm
>
> This is playing havoc with updates...
> --
> best,
> Eliot
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20150203/05ce88be/attachment-0001.htm