Hey,

On 18.01.2015, at 01:01, Chris Muller <asqueaker at gmail.com> wrote:

> Of course!  I think everyone who has trunk access probably can copy it to squeak45.  That will make it available via "Update Squeak".
> 

I think copying is not the right way here.
We should really only backport the changes…
Best
	-tobias


> But keep in mind we still have the bug where when we rename a class and then reuse the old name, the image will be hosed.  I need help from Eliot or someone else who knows why the super pointer is jacked.
> 
> On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 9:23 AM, Tobias Pape <Das.Linux at gmx.de> wrote:
> Hey,
> 
> On 16.01.2015, at 22:05, Chris Muller <asqueaker at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> After the rename, everything still looks fine.  Bytecodes are exactly
>> the same, and CM literal binding looks good and subclasses /
>> superclass structure looks correct.
>> 
>> I can't know what to fix if I can't see what's wrong..
> 
> If this is good, can we backport it to 4.5?
> 
> Best
>        -Tobias