Thanks Fabio, say, which platform did you test on?  Hm, something
interesting -- that new SqueakSSL (for Linux) is 7 MB where the one I
have been using is only 27K, which easily makes it the largest plugin
and would slightly inflate teh size of the All-In-One.

Why is it so much bigger, is it compiled with debug information or something?



On Sun, Jul 19, 2015 at 3:56 AM, Fabio Niephaus <lists at fniephaus.com> wrote:
> + 1 for releasing 4.6 and handling problems as users find them :)
>
> But there's one problem that I just found: try and run the following and you
> should get a SqueakSSL error (-5):
>
> (WebClient new httpGet:
> 'https://api.travis-ci.org/repos/squeak-smalltalk/squeak.org/builds')
> content
>
> Looks like we forgot to update the SqueakSSL plugins with the ones from [1]?
> After doing that manually, the above works just fine...
>
> Regards,
> Fabio
>
> [1] https://github.com/itsmeront/squeakssl/releases
>
> --
>
> On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 11:06 PM Eliot Miranda <eliot.miranda at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 1:59 PM, Chris Muller <ma.chris.m at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> There was 1 vote for including the legacy Mac plugins and 0 against.
>>> So Craig and I made one last All-in-One and its uploaded.
>>>
>>> So, I think can we call 4.6 "done" then?
>>
>>
>> Do we have any volunteers to do some shake down tests?  dare we do some
>> shake down tests?  SHould we instead release and handle problems as users
>> find them?  Chris, have you run your test suite using the 4.6 yet?
>>
>> --
>> _,,,^..^,,,_
>> best, Eliot
>
>
>
>