If it were possible, then there would be no need to add this.

Levente

On Wed, 27 May 2015, Norbert Hartl wrote:

>
> Sounds great! Is it possible to access to whole certificate data as well?
>
> Norbert
>
>> Am 26.05.2015 um 23:55 schrieb Levente Uzonyi <leves at elte.hu>:
>>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I've implemented support for reading the domain names from the certificate's SAN extension[1] in SqueakSSL.
>> The image side code is in the Inbox[2]. It is backwards compatible -- everything works as before without the VM changes.
>> I've also uploaded the modified files[3][4] for the unix platform, and a diff[5] (which somehow doesn't include the changes of the .h file).
>>
>> The VM support code for other platforms are to be done.
>>
>> These changes fix the failing SqueakSSL test in the Trunk, so I suggest including the .mcz file in the 4.6 release.
>>
>> Levente
>>
>> [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SubjectAltName
>> [2] http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/2015-May/184581.html
>> [3] http://leves.web.elte.hu/squeak/SqueakSSL/SqueakSSL.h
>> [4] http://leves.web.elte.hu/squeak/SqueakSSL/sqUnixOpenSSL.c
>> [5] http://leves.web.elte.hu/squeak/SqueakSSL/diff.txt
>
>