[squeak-dev] Re: The Trunk: Morphic-kfr.1048.mcz

karl ramberg karlramberg at gmail.com
Sat Nov 21 21:37:27 UTC 2015


I moved them to MorphicExtras-Widgets

Best,
Karl

On Sat, Nov 21, 2015 at 8:26 PM, Tobias Pape <Das.Linux at gmx.de> wrote:

>
> On 21.11.2015, at 18:51, karl ramberg <karlramberg at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > ProgressMorph can by definition not be the standard widget since it is
> not used at all in the image.
> >
>
> But we're talking about Applications that are not in the base image,
> aren't we?
> It's like saying, "nobody in the Qt framework uses this widget, remove
> it", when
> actually, the users cannot be expected _within_ the framework but rather
> as users of
> the framework. Just because our bundled morphic tools/applications have no
> need
> for such a progress bar, does not mean that non-base-image applications
> have neither.
>
> Marcel made the case for a simple "questionnaire application" where you
> would want
> to indicate progress throughout the questioning process. The system
> progress bar
> would be unfit, as it is designed to be used modally (see examples of both
> progress morphs).
>
> Don't get me wrong, I'm not making the case for keeping things (the
> ProgressMorph in this case)
> just because, but to make sure we are not deprecating/obsoleting stuff
> that would
> count as framework outlet point or "public widgets".
>
>
> :)
>
> Best regards
>         -Tobias
>
> PS: some other widgets that are unused in the base image
>         JoysickMorph is only in Flaps
>         MorphHierarchy (?)
>         SelectedObjectThumbnail
>         BackgroundMorph
>         BasicButton
>         (And others in the MorphicExtras-Widgets category)
> >
> > Best,
> > Karl
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 11:52 PM, Tobias Pape <Das.Linux at gmx.de> wrote:
> >
> > On 20.11.2015, at 23:37, karl ramberg <karlramberg at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Maybe it should be moved to MorphicExtras-Widgets ?
> > >
> > > If it's in Morphic-Widgets it's seems like it's the standard progress
> widget, which it is not .
> >
> > It depends on what 'standard progress widget' means.
> >
> > If it is the one I can just use in my mophic application, without
> anythin fancy, won't that be the 'standard widget'?
> > And the one opened during system progress (using that Progress
> Notification thingy) be the system progress widget, hence, 'non-standard'
> (but special) widget?
> >
> > just my 2ct
> >
> > Best regards
> >         -Tobias
> >
> >
> > >
> > > Best,
> > > Karl
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 9:49 PM, marcel.taeumel <Marcel.Taeumel at hpi.de>
> wrote:
> > > Imagine a wizard that wants to indicate progress to the user. Or a
> > > questionnaire. :)
> > >
> > > Like this widget: http://doc.qt.io/qt-4.8/qprogressbar.html
> > >
> > > Maybe we need a PluggableProgressBar. I understand that the
> ProgressBarMorph
> > > used to be used to show system progress. Nevertheless, such a widget
> can be
> > > valuable for any application.
> > >
> > > Best,
> > > Marcel
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > View this message in context:
> http://forum.world.st/The-Trunk-Morphic-kfr-1048-mcz-tp4862058p4862317.html
> > > Sent from the Squeak - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20151121/e68a4971/attachment.htm


More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list