[squeak-dev] Removing of Universe classes

H. Hirzel hannes.hirzel at gmail.com
Wed Nov 25 13:31:57 UTC 2015


Thanks, Karl,  for this piece of information. I have updated
Package Universes
http://wiki.squeak.org/squeak/3785
accordingly.

--HH

On 11/25/15, karl ramberg <karlramberg at gmail.com> wrote:
> Universes was removed from menus because it was not functional.
>
> To remove Universes from Trunk one has to take into  account the update
> number.
> I think the update number is the sum of all package versions ?
>
> I'm not sure how one does this.
>
> Best,
> Karl
>
> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 1:39 PM, H. Hirzel <hannes.hirzel at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On 11/25/15, Frank Shearar <frank.shearar at gmail.com> wrote:
>> > On 24 November 2015 at 21:09, H. Hirzel <hannes.hirzel at gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >> On 11/21/15, Chris Muller <asqueaker at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>> On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 12:40 PM, tim Rowledge <tim at rowledge.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>> >>>> I suggest we should Universes.
>>
>>
>> >>> +1.  +1.  +1 and, +1.
>> ..
>>
>> >
>> > I was under the impression that Universes _was removed_, like, back in
>> > 4.4 or the beginning of the 4.5 cycle, when I was up to my eyeballs in
>> > hairy dependencies... Certainly the build processes think so -
>> >
>> https://github.com/squeak-smalltalk/squeak-ci/blob/master/package-load-scripts/Universes.st
>> > is the _load script_ for Universes (implying its _unloaded by default_
>> > state).
>> >
>> > frank
>> >
>> >> I think this has been discussed before the release of 4.6 and people
>> >> agreed but at that time it was to late to do it.
>> >>
>> >> --Hannes
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>>
>> Hi Frank
>>
>> Indeed I do not see a Universe browser in the app menu of Squeak 5.0.
>>
>> However there seem to be some classes left in the system, see screen
>> shot.
>>
>> So there was removal but it seems it was not done completely.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>


More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list