[squeak-dev] Re: ExceptionTests / Wrong error handler
marcel.taeumel
Marcel.Taeumel at hpi.de
Tue Sep 8 05:08:51 UTC 2015
Is primitive 199 still a marker only? There seems to be no in-image handling
of this behavior. Thus, I suspect the comment in BlockClosure >> #on:do: is
wrong. Or is the more VM magic involved and the primitive 201 (BlockClosure
>> #value) walks the stack and looks for "handlerActive == true"?!
--
View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/ExceptionTests-Wrong-error-handler-tp4848699p4848715.html
Sent from the Squeak - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|