On 18.02.2016, at 09:30, David T. Lewis <lewis at mail.msen.com> wrote:
> 
> I guess it has been nearly two years since I did that project. Time flies.
> 
> We discussed it on the list in thread "A UTC based implementation of
> DateAndTime":
> 
>  http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/2014-May/178325.html
> 
> But I'm not asking you to review that project, I just wanted to suggest
> giving Chronology its own package so that it would be possible to do
> things like this. For my purposes, I can always use a SAR. But it would be
> a lot nicer to be able to use Monticello.

Why wouldn’t it work to submit a new Kernel package to inbox? Migration issue?

- Bert -



-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4207 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20160218/e28cadf3/smime.bin