> Is "params size >= 54" supposed to be a check whether its running Spur
> or Cog?  Note that we have Smalltalk isRunningSpur for that check.
> Besides that, however, is the question whether this shouldn't just be
> on the 4.6 branch?

The size of the parameter array varies in different VM code bases.

>
> Dave, I've noticed this recurring theme that you don't want to move to
> Spur.  Is it true?  Why?

No, that is not true.

I like to maintain backward compatibility where possible, and I find that
a little bit of effort on that front can prevent a great deal of pain and
confusion down the road. Many years of maintaining OSProcess over a wide
range image versions says I am not wrong. There is no need any
ConfigurationOf or SqueakMap updates, you can pretty much load it into any
image and it just works.

Dave

>
> On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 10:37 PM,  <commits at source.squeak.org> wrote:
>> David T. Lewis uploaded a new version of System to project The Trunk:
>> http://source.squeak.org/trunk/System-dtl.790.mcz
>>
>> ==================== Summary ====================
>>
>> Name: System-dtl.790
>> Author: dtl
>> Time: 29 January 2016, 11:37:48.065507 pm
>> UUID: 1ccde720-42a2-41fe-bcc4-cb9694d5af07
>> Ancestors: System-eem.789
>>
>> Update vmStatisticsReportString to restore memory stats when running on
>> pre-spur VM.
>>
>> =============== Diff against System-eem.789 ===============
>>