[squeak-dev] Re: Renaming Squeak's system version from 'Squeak*alpha' to 'SqueakTrunk'

Tobias Pape Das.Linux at gmx.de
Tue Jun 28 08:27:08 UTC 2016


On 28.06.2016, at 09:36, marcel.taeumel <Marcel.Taeumel at hpi.de> wrote:

> Eliot Miranda-2 wrote
>> On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 10:25 AM, Ben Coman &lt;
> 
>> btc@
> 
>> &gt; wrote:
>> 
>>> Release To Manfacture
>>> 
>> 
>> I much prefer "final".
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> 
>>> On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 1:01 AM, Eliot Miranda &lt;
> 
>> eliot.miranda@
> 
>> &gt;
>>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 4:05 AM, H. Hirzel &lt;
> 
>> hannes.hirzel@
> 
>> &gt;
>>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> +1 Makes sense.
>>>>> 
>>>>> BTW, what does Rtm stand for?
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> I'd like to know this too.  No one seems to have answered this yet. 
>>> What
>>>> does "Rtm" mean?  I know what RTFM means.  Doesn't seem to fit here ;-)
>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> And how will minor maintenance releases be marked, which happen from
>>>>> time to time?
>>>>> 
>>>>> As Tobias writes
>>>>> 
>>>>>    SystemVersion current
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> does not return an 'alpha' suffix, this should be fixed.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> --Hannes
>>>>> 
>>>>> On 6/22/16, marcel.taeumel &lt;
> 
>> Marcel.Taeumel@
> 
>> &gt; wrote:
>>> images,
>>> doesn't
>>> I
>>> that,
>>> them
>>> can
>>> http://forum.world.st/Renaming-Squeak-s-system-version-from-Squeak-alpha-to-SqueakTrunk-tp4902398p4902424.html
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> --
>>>> _,,,^..^,,,_
>>>> best, Eliot
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> _,,,^..^,,,_
>> best, Eliot
> 
> RTM is not needed. After rc_n comes alpha plus the release with no suffix.

I thought alpha always precedes rc's?

:D

> 
> Best,
> Marcel





More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list