[squeak-dev] Re: Renaming Squeak's system version from
'Squeak*alpha' to 'SqueakTrunk'
Tobias Pape
Das.Linux at gmx.de
Tue Jun 28 08:27:08 UTC 2016
On 28.06.2016, at 09:36, marcel.taeumel <Marcel.Taeumel at hpi.de> wrote:
> Eliot Miranda-2 wrote
>> On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 10:25 AM, Ben Coman <
>
>> btc@
>
>> > wrote:
>>
>>> Release To Manfacture
>>>
>>
>> I much prefer "final".
>>
>>
>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 1:01 AM, Eliot Miranda <
>
>> eliot.miranda@
>
>> >
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 4:05 AM, H. Hirzel <
>
>> hannes.hirzel@
>
>> >
>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> +1 Makes sense.
>>>>>
>>>>> BTW, what does Rtm stand for?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I'd like to know this too. No one seems to have answered this yet.
>>> What
>>>> does "Rtm" mean? I know what RTFM means. Doesn't seem to fit here ;-)
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> And how will minor maintenance releases be marked, which happen from
>>>>> time to time?
>>>>>
>>>>> As Tobias writes
>>>>>
>>>>> SystemVersion current
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> does not return an 'alpha' suffix, this should be fixed.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --Hannes
>>>>>
>>>>> On 6/22/16, marcel.taeumel <
>
>> Marcel.Taeumel@
>
>> > wrote:
>>> images,
>>> doesn't
>>> I
>>> that,
>>> them
>>> can
>>> http://forum.world.st/Renaming-Squeak-s-system-version-from-Squeak-alpha-to-SqueakTrunk-tp4902398p4902424.html
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> _,,,^..^,,,_
>>>> best, Eliot
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> _,,,^..^,,,_
>> best, Eliot
>
> RTM is not needed. After rc_n comes alpha plus the release with no suffix.
I thought alpha always precedes rc's?
:D
>
> Best,
> Marcel
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|