[squeak-dev] RaspberryPI 3 Squeak performance

karl ramberg karlramberg at gmail.com
Thu Mar 17 17:41:53 UTC 2016


Cool

Best,
Karl

On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 6:36 PM, tim Rowledge <tim at rowledge.org> wrote:

> Just as an FYI - the new Pi 3 performs quite well with the COG/Spur Squeak
> we use for Scratch.
>
> Although the original Green Book benchmarks are not really very useful any
> more it is always fun to see what the number is and for a Pi3 we now hit
> ~100 Dorado. For $35 frikkin’ bucks! I suspect the Dorados used more cost
> of electricity per day than that.
>
> And for the larger ‘Shootout’ benchmarks that some prefer, the results are
> fairly impressive.
> nbody -42.6
> bintree - 30.4
> chredux - 53.9
> threadring - 67.9
>  - all around 30% faster than the Pi2. Also interesting is the comparison
> with some old result Eliot logged for his 2012 MacBook Pro 2.2GHz quad i7
> running the closure interpreter.
> nbody - 40.9
> bintree 30.6
> chredux - 30.7
> threadring - 9.2
>
> I think that’s quite good.
>
> tim
> --
> tim Rowledge; tim at rowledge.org; http://www.rowledge.org/tim
> As far as we know, our computer has never had an undetected error.
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20160317/4768de56/attachment.htm


More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list