> On 05-05-2016, at 1:02 PM, Yoshiki Ohshima <Yoshiki.Ohshima at acm.org> wrote:
> 
> On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 11:11 AM, tim Rowledge <tim at rowledge.org> wrote:
>> 
>>> On 05-05-2016, at 10:36 AM, Yoshiki Ohshima <Yoshiki.Ohshima at acm.org> wrote:
>>> 
>>> It actually is not clear yet which branches are the right one for
>>> current Scratch on raspi and also future proof.  Perhaps doing for
>>> multiple branches is necessary?  (What are the relationship of those?)
>> 
>> Oh, it’s absolutely clear for the Pi; Cog/Spur. The ancient original MIT image and an elderly interpreter are kept around for emergency use but will not be updated.
> 
> Okay!
> 
> By any chance, can you tell me how you test things? for Raspberry Pi?

For Japanese input? I don’t, because I can’t and wouldn’t have the faintest idea if it were correct anyway. I leave it to Kazuhiro Abee to let me know when he notices something wrong.

tim
--
tim Rowledge; tim at rowledge.org; http://www.rowledge.org/tim
A clear conscience is usually the sign of a bad memory.