[squeak-dev] Environment declarations vs bindings

Levente Uzonyi leves at caesar.elte.hu
Mon Oct 3 12:26:13 UTC 2016


On Mon, 3 Oct 2016, Edgar De Cleene wrote:

> We should go  Cuis simpler Smalltalk.

Sure. Just port Squeak on top of Cuis without losing functionality and 
performance.

Levente

> We NEED a Kernel and a Core Squeak without experiments.
> And people should be able to load Traits or Environments or SeeWhatCoolIsThese if they choose to do so.
> And the rest of us live without pain.
>
> By the way Alejandro Reimondo have his old Fenix image builder as subclass of Environments of Dan Ingalls and Guille Polito and Pharo guys have his Kernel building tool as kind of Environments .
>
> Edgar
>
>> On Oct 3, 2016, at 02:49, Stéphane Rollandin <lecteur at zogotounga.net> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> There must of course be a decent manual (or collection of writings that constitute a manual) because *nobody* would do something stupid like adding a bunch of code that doesn’t have an obvious reason for being or an explanation of how to use it, or examples. It just couldn’t happen.
>>
>> Ok, I know this is Squeak's tradition.
>>
>> The fact is I'm genuinely interested in Environments, as I used to be interested in Traits but never did anything with it because of the missing support.
>>
>> What a waste.
>>
>>
>> Stef
>>
>>
>
>
>


More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list