Ah I forgot:

On 27.02.2017, at 13:00, Tobias Pape <Das.Linux at gmx.de> wrote:

> Hi,
> 

Motivation:
 - This thread: http://forum.world.st/Attempting-to-run-Squeak-all-in-one-download-on-ubuntu-linux-tt4936001.html
 - This issue: https://github.com/dalehenrich/metacello-work/issues/427#issuecomment-281919088
 - This thread: http://forum.world.st/Problem-with-Squeak5-1-16549-32bit-All-in-One-tp4935860.html
 - This thread: http://forum.world.st/Squeak5-1rc2-16535-32bit-fail-to-open-in-macOS-Sierra-tp4934524.html
All these are at lease partially because of the way AIOs work and how we deliver them

Moreover:
 - This old post: http://forum.world.st/All-in-ones-tp4662358p4662665.html
 - My experience from building All-in-ones for Seaside and for bi-annual courses at HPI that use Squeak.


Also:
 - It does not work on ARM/RaspberryPi
 - It does not work on BSDen (yes, I know it's rare)
 - It does not work on RISC OS (Sorry, tim)
 * Points above are no problem _individually_ (again, sorry, tim), but in their combination.

> here's a bullet point list:
> - macOS Sierra needs a special vm compared w/ previous ones
> - macOS Sierra makes it hard to _just run_ downloaded bundles/All-in-ones
> - all-in-ones look ugly since Yosemite due to new requiremens for code signing.
> - we have some indirection in the shell scripts for the linux variant
> - we still have this strange LD_LIBRARY_PATH dance that apparently fails on 
>   newest Ubuntu (see recent mail)
> - occasionally, we have people from BSDen who also want to use Squeak.
> 
> So, I'd propose:
> - Ditch the AOIs.
> - Deliver macOS bundles as DMG, not as Zip, so as to force people to
>   move the bundle, so that macOS Sierra is happy to run stuff.
> In the long run:
> - Provide deb's and rpm's
> 
> 
> Best regards
> 	-Tobias
>