Crazy that *I* would suggest something like this but...  could it have
been needed for the simulator?

On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 1:32 PM, Eliot Miranda <eliot.miranda at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
>     another dubious piece of code is this:
>
> SmallInteger>>instVarAt: i
> "Small integer has to be specially handled."
>
> i = 1 ifTrue: [^self].
> self error: 'argument too big for small integer instVarAt:'
>
> Either this is important and should be replicated in Character and
> SmallFloat64 (the other two immediate classes) or it should be discarded.
> It's ancient (pre version stamps).  I vote to nuke it.  Opinions?
> _,,,^..^,,,_
> best, Eliot
>
>
>