[squeak-dev] More cruft

Chris Muller asqueaker at gmail.com
Fri Mar 31 20:09:39 UTC 2017

Crazy that *I* would suggest something like this but...  could it have
been needed for the simulator?

On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 1:32 PM, Eliot Miranda <eliot.miranda at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi All,
>     another dubious piece of code is this:
> SmallInteger>>instVarAt: i
> "Small integer has to be specially handled."
> i = 1 ifTrue: [^self].
> self error: 'argument too big for small integer instVarAt:'
> Either this is important and should be replicated in Character and
> SmallFloat64 (the other two immediate classes) or it should be discarded.
> It's ancient (pre version stamps).  I vote to nuke it.  Opinions?
> _,,,^..^,,,_
> best, Eliot

More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list