It sounds like a left over...
no time stamp in Squeak, so it must be old.
Display reverse; reverse means we wanted to catch when such oddity was
necessary.
(I would do it differently with an Exception and a MessageTally like I
already exhibited several times)
The fact that reverse; reverse was commented is more difficult to
interpret... Is it really necessary?
I removed the method in a Squeak image, and so fare nothing wrong happened,
but it does not prove anything.
The best is to ask in Squeak lists, maybe someone can remember...
Or carefully analyze all senders of suspend...

2017-11-18 22:36 GMT+01:00 Aliaksei Syrel <alex.syrel at gmail.com>:

> Hi,
>
> I was looking at nil (already funny) and found a very interesting method:
>
> suspend
>    "Kills off processes that didn't terminate properly"
>    "Display reverse; reverse."  "<-- So we can catch the suspend bug"
>    Processor terminateActive
>
> It means that the following code is probably the shortest way to kill your
> image (save first!)
>
> nil suspend
>
> It terminates a UI process if evaluated from anywhere using CMD+d :D
>
> Cheers,
> Alex
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20171118/52a2225c/attachment.html>