Thanks Bob,

Indeed that is exactly what I'm seeing. SystemWindows have the problem, and
ordinary morphs do not. Thanks for the tip.

Dave


On Sat, Nov 25, 2017 at 01:29:33PM -0500, Bob Arning wrote:
> If what you are seeing is bad behavior when moving a SystemWindow, but 
> reasonable behavior when moving an ordinary Morph, then the answer might 
> lie in SystemWindow>>justDroppedInto:event:. The initial focus for 
> world-in-world was not really SystemWindows, but the kind of things one 
> would see in Etoys.
> 
> 
> On 11/25/17 11:08 AM, David T. Lewis wrote:
> >On Sat, Nov 25, 2017 at 04:09:12PM +0100, H. Hirzel wrote:
> >>On 11/16/17, tim Rowledge <tim at rowledge.org> wrote:
> >>>>On 15-11-2017, at 6:45 PM, David T. Lewis <lewis at mail.msen.com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>It certainly is nice to be able to rotate the world 30 degrees off its
> >>>>axis
> >>>>and still have it remain functional.
> >>>Indeed - you have no idea how often I???ve longed for this???
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>tim
> >>... The most useful feature is  that you can easily move objects in
> >>and out of the subproject to the parent project.
> >>
> >But something is wrong with the way this is working. The symptoms are
> >that if I do ENTER ACTIVE to activate the project morph as a 
> >world-in-world,
> >and then move or resize windows within that activated world, the geometry
> >is all wrong, and it seems to be derived from the geometry of the main 
> >world
> >(for the full display).
> >
> >When the mouse pointer moves over the activated world-in-world, is it
> >the case that the current project, world, and hand should be changed
> >to that of the world-in-world? That is not happening, and I suspect it
> >is at the root of the geometry problem.
> >
> >I am guessing that there needs to be some hook to update the current
> >project to that of the world-in-world project whenever the mouse pointer
> >is over that project.
> >
> >I know that I am not saying this very clearly but maybe it will trigger
> >an idea from someone who is familiar with this.
> >
> >Dave
> >  
> >
> 

>