[squeak-dev] Is SyntaxMorph important?
Bob Arning
arning315 at comcast.net
Thu Nov 30 03:02:01 UTC 2017
FWIW, #testAll did not work as far back as Squeak 3.2 of 2002 vintage.
The first error I encountered was in
SyntaxMorph>>printCascadeNodeOn:indent: and I suspect that when
SyntaxMorph was repurposed, cascades were not important.
On 11/29/17 9:31 PM, David T. Lewis wrote:
> SyntaxMorph is in the Etoys package, but is missing the asMorphicSyntaxIn:
> methods that are needed in the ParseNode hierarchy.
>
> I tried importing the missing methods from an Etoys development image, which
> is sufficient to make SyntaxMorph class>>test work. But SyntaxMorph class>>testAll
> runs into problems, so I am expecting that the various compiler and Spur
> enhancements in recent years mean that some work would need to be done in
> this area.
>
> I am inclined to commit the current (old) version the missing methods to the
> Etoys package, but I do not want to do that if they were intentionally removed
> or if someone has a plan to provide a fully working update.
>
> Dave
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20171129/49a72b48/attachment.html>
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|