Hi,
I followed Marcel's advise

Best,
Karl

On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 7:52 AM, Marcel Taeumel <marcel.taeumel at hpi.de>
wrote:

> Hi, there.
>
> Just replicate the behavior of #openInWorld, which uses "self
> currentWorld".
>
> Best,
> Marcel
>
> Am 16.04.2018 21:32:21 schrieb Eliot Miranda <eliot.miranda at gmail.com>:
> Hi Karl,
>
> On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 12:01 PM, <commits at source.squeak.org> wrote:
>
>> Karl Ramberg uploaded a new version of Morphic to project The Trunk:
>> http://source.squeak.org/trunk/Morphic-kfr.1415.mcz
>>
>> ==================== Summary ====================
>>
>> Name: Morphic-kfr.1415
>> Author: kfr
>> Time: 16 April 2018, 9:00:44.326565 pm
>> UUID: fd7edd49-a300-764f-8d5d-fa2d2ad7b65b
>> Ancestors: Morphic-mt.1414
>>
>> self world can be nil here
>>
>> =============== Diff against Morphic-mt.1414 ===============
>>
>> Item was changed:
>>   ----- Method: Morph>>openNear: (in category 'initialization') -----
>>   openNear: aRectangle
>>         self
>>                 openNear: aRectangle
>> +               in: Project current world!
>> -               in: self world!
>>
>
> Shouldn't that be
>
>              in: (self world ifNil: [Project current world])
>
> ?  If one were using an arbitrary world in which one asked a Morph to
> open, wouldn't it be strange if that child morph opened up not in the world
> of the parent but in the current world?  Isn't this important enough to
> provide an accessor such as
> Morph>>world access
>     theBestOfAllPossibleWorlds
>         ^self world ifNil: [Project current world]
>
> _,,,^..^,,,_
> best, Candide
>
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20180417/686d65c8/attachment.html>