[squeak-dev] https

Tobias Pape Das.Linux at gmx.de
Tue Feb 6 22:56:27 UTC 2018


Hi Phil, 

> On 06.02.2018, at 23:49, Phil B <pbpublist at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> It never gets that far (i.e. to log anything): the error occurs in #primitiveSSLCreate and there is no log output.  I've confirmed that the plugin exists in the 20180206 VM (and the image appears to be otherwise working).  When I switch back to the 20171214 build with the same image, no error loading the plugin (other than the issue we're discussing re: some urls failing with -5)

can you give me the output of "locate libssl.so"?

Best regards
	-Tobias

> 
> On Feb 6, 2018 4:43 PM, "Tobias Pape" <Das.Linux at gmx.de> wrote:
> Hi Phil
> > On 06.02.2018, at 22:26, Phil B <pbpublist at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Tobias,
> >
> > I tried the 32-bit 20180206 build and got Error: primitiveSSLCreate failed.  (I'd expect the same result on 64-bit but will give it a shot) This is using Cuis on Debian 9 stable.  Assuming there are no image-side changes needed, this is probably be a shared library issue as I've seen this in the past when the VM is built on/for Ubuntu which was using a different SSL lib version than Debian stable.  I'll try building a VM and report back the results (it will probably be late this week before I'll have time to get into it)
> 
> I have recently changed the SqueakSSL plugin. As long as you have libssl:i386 installed, everything should work.
> Can you give me the console output with logLeve:1 again?
> 
> Best regards
>         -Tobias
> 
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Phil
> >
> > On Feb 1, 2018 1:51 PM, "Tobias Pape" <Das.Linux at gmx.de> wrote:
> > Hi Phil,
> >
> >
> > > On 22.12.2017, at 21:29, Phil B <pbpublist at gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Tobias,
> > >
> > > I saw there was a recent change to the VM related to this issue so I downloaded a recent build from bintray (specifically the cogspurlinuxht 32- and 64-bit builds dated 201712142058) and tried them out on Debian 9. Unfortunately, this didn't seem to change very much for me (the majority of pages I was getting -5 on, I still do)
> > >
> > > Here are a few sample urls I was having problems with:
> > > https://blog.jessfraz.com/post/containers-zones-jails-vms
> > > https://blog.keras.io/the-future-of-deep-learning.html
> > > https://danluu.com/cpu-bugs
> > >
> >
> > Can you try with one of the latest vms?
> >
> > https://bintray.com/opensmalltalk/vm/cog/
> >
> > Best regards
> >         -Tobias
> >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Phil
> > >
> > > On Aug 29, 2017 5:49 AM, "Tobias Pape" <Das.Linux at gmx.de> wrote:
> > > Hi Phil
> > >
> > > > On 24.08.2017, at 22:30, Phil B <pbpublist at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Also, if you ignore the name checking of the cert (i.e. just blindly accept it... dangerous to do with anything important) I've found that you'll often either get a connection timeout or -5 error from the plugin.  Not sure if this is specifically related to SAN support (i.e. is there additional negotiation that needs to be done?) or if there are some newer https features that need to be added...
> > >
> > > can you tell me your platform and the plugin version you are using? I'd really like to get rid of those -5's :)
> > >
> > > Best regard
> > >         -tobias
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > On Aug 23, 2017 2:37 AM, "Marcel Taeumel" <marcel.taeumel at hpi.de> wrote:
> > > > Note that due to incomplete or missing SAN support on some platforms, using alternative names can still raise a SqueakSSLCertificateError:
> > > >
> > > > WebClient httpGet: 'https://google.com'
> > > >
> > > > Best,
> > > > Marcel
> > > >> Am 22.08.2017 22:14:38 schrieb Ron Teitelbaum <ron at usmedrec.com>:
> > > >>
> > > >> SqueakSSL
> > > >>
> > > >> WebClient httpGet: 'https://www.google.com'
> > > >>
> > > >> Ron
> > > >>
> > > >> On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 3:09 PM, Eliot Miranda <eliot.miranda at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >> Hi All,
> > > >>
> > > >>    what are people using for https support?
> > > >>
> > > >> _,,,^..^,,,_
> > > >> best, Eliot
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> 



More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list