Did the Squeak-Version version not have its number bumped to correspond to
the removal of those two packages?

(Update number, remember, is the sum of all the versions of all the
packages loaded in the base image: if you remove Foo version 10, you need
to bump Squeak-Version's version by 10.)

frank

On 24 January 2018 at 12:57, Chris Cunningham <cunningham.cb at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Was that related to the packages being dropped from the update list?
> Wasn't there discussion years ago about some other place that needed to be
> tweaked to keep the numbers from dropping when that happened?
>
> (wish I had remembered this when Elliot was asking about dropping the
> packages)
>
> -cbc
>
> On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 12:53 PM, tim Rowledge <tim at rowledge.org> wrote:
>
>> Just did an update. Loaded ok.
>> But -
>> … and Transcript output -
>>
>> "
>> ==========  Update completed:  17650 -> 17303 ==========
>> “
>>
>> Pretty sure that ought not be the case...
>>
>> tim
>> --
>> tim Rowledge; tim at rowledge.org; http://www.rowledge.org/tim
>> Oxymorons: Sweet sorrow
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20180124/e8728bc7/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Screen Shot 2018-01-24 at 12.46.42 PM.png
Type: image/png
Size: 39010 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20180124/e8728bc7/attachment-0001.png>