Hi Tim,


> On Mar 15, 2018, at 1:31 PM, Tim Johnson <digit at sonic.net> wrote:
> 
> Hi Eliot,
> 
>>> On Mar 15, 2018, at 12:12 PM, Eliot Miranda <eliot.miranda at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> In my working trunk image, I tried reverting (IIRC) Context>>inspectorClass's removal using Monticello Browser.  This left me in a state where I received a DNU whenever I tried to diff, show changes, or save to the inbox repo.   Things got ugly.  I saved screenshots.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> In the freshly updated trunk image, I didn’t fool around with reverting or diffing inside of Monticello Browser.  I just went straight to trying a ’save’ to the inbox repo.   This successfully created a commit (no DNU) but the commit again included the removal of Context>>inspectorClass.
>> 
>> Where does the removal come form?  As required, Context>>inspectorClass is in Tools.  How is it being removed?
> 
> The current 6.0a image as downloaded from Squeak.org (Squeak6.0alpha-17606-32bit.image [Dec 21, 2017]) contains this anomaly and updating doesn’t help.
> 
> I just manually performed a bunch of diffs on the Tools project in the MC repository browser (I imagine there is a better way to do this).
> 
> It looks like Tools-eem.750.mcz is the last to have MethodContext>>inspectorClass in its *Extensions -> *Tools->Inspector.  Tools-eem.751.mcz is the first to have Context>>inspectorClass there.
> 
> Commit comment for Tools-eem.751.mcz (30 March 2017):
> 
> "Commit the essential cange of reference from MethodContext to Context before commiting the Kernel that does away with MethodContext."
> 
> Does that help?  
> 
> I have some suspicion, from my less-knowledgable viewpoint, that since MethodContext>>inspectorClass is in an *Extension, some subsequent commit could have come through in a different project, hadn’t updated to Tools-eem.751.mcz, and was missing Context>>inspectorClass?  But what do I know...

Well, the problem is not in trunk, and we're converging in the next release being 5.2.  So perhaps we should take down the 6.0a image that is causing problems and try again.  IIRC if I do ReleaseBuilder saveAsNewRelease then the resulting image is perfectly fine.


> 
> Thanks,
> Tim
> 
> 
> 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20180315/6b4c622f/attachment.html>