Hi Levente,

On Mon, 5 Nov 2018 at 00:35, Levente Uzonyi <leves at caesar.elte.hu> wrote:
>
> On Sun, 4 Nov 2018, Alistair Grant wrote:
>
> > Hi All,
> >
> > If I attempt to execute the following:
> >
> > | rules |
> >
> > rules := RBParseTreeRewriter new.
> >
> > rules replace: 'state at: `@index put: `@expr' with: 'state at:
> > `@index put: `@expr asC_unsigned_int'.
>
> I presume the version you use doesn't support underscores in selectors.
> Does it work if you use a selector with no underscores in it?

That's it, thanks!  (it works without the underscores)

I hate it when I forget to include version information, sorry:

Squeak5.3alpha
latest update: #18261
Image format 68021 (64 bit)

AST-Core-eem.97
Refactoring-Changes-eem.22
Refactoring-Core-ul.162
Refactoring-Environment-eem.11
Refactoring-Squeak-Platform-cwp.2
Refactoring-Tests-Changes-lr.16
Refactoring-Tests-Core-lr.56
Refactoring-Tests-Environment-eem.5


> How did you load RB? Did you use the Metacello configuration? (it may
> not be up-to-date)

All the above appear to be the latest versions on
http://www.squeaksource.com/rb.

This is a vmmaker image, they were all loaded through:

https://github.com/OpenSmalltalk/opensmalltalk-vm/blob/Cog/image/BuildSqueakSpurTrunkVMMakerImage.st

It sounds like there may be an updated version of RB that already
addresses this?

Thanks again,
Alistair


> Levente
>
> >
> > (rules executeTree: (MD5Plugin parseTreeFor:
> > #md5ProcessBuffer:withState:)) ifTrue:
> > [rules tree newSource inspect].
> > self error: 'parse tree rewrite failed'
> >
> >
> > I get "Error: End of statement list encountered" (stack trace below).
> > The same works and produces the expected output in Pharo 7.
> >
> > It looks like the Refactoring Browser has diverged quite a bit between
> > Squeak and Pharo.
> >
> > Who looks after RB in Squeak, and is there a plan to keep in sync with
> > Pharo, or the other way around, or should this be fixed independently?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Alistair