[squeak-dev] possible bug in DateAndTime localTimeOffset

Chris Muller asqueaker at gmail.com
Thu Oct 25 18:24:26 UTC 2018


I think Eliot was making a 420 / California  joke...

On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 1:19 PM Chris Cunningham <cunningham.cb at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Nope, CA is 7 hours behind UTC - hence the -420.
> And Google backs me up on this:
> [image: image.png]
> Of course, with the current implementation of DateAndTime, where the
> date/time is stored in local time, the offset is...weird.  You have to
> subtract the offset to get to UTC.
> If/when we adopt the UTCDateAndTime package, then the internal
> represenatation and offset mirrors the rest of the industry, where you add
> the offset to the internal UTC time to get to the local time.
>
> -cbc
>
> On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 11:11 AM Eliot Miranda <eliot.miranda at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>>     I note that here in California
>>         (DateAndTime localTimeZone offset asSeconds / 60) rounded = -420
>> but surely in CA it is +420 ??
>>
>> ;-)
>> _,,,^..^,,,_
>> best, Eliot
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20181025/dc0cb16f/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image.png
Type: image/png
Size: 12648 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20181025/dc0cb16f/attachment.png>


More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list