[squeak-dev] [ANN] ScriptBook 0.3

Edgar De Cleene edgardec2005 at gmail.com
Mon Apr 29 15:13:52 UTC 2019


Ok
ScriptBook seems a good idea
Maybe the how to have FunSqueak.
I check how to load some and test works.

The base is 5.2 stable release ?

Sent from my iPhone

On 29 Apr 2019, at 10:56, Chris Cunnington <brasspen at gmail.com> wrote:

>> Tonel seems Pharo, probably the others too.
>> How you test if works ?
>> Pharo is very different of Squeak this days.
> 
> Yup, more good questions. And I’ll point the responsibility elsewhere. I figure if people publish a script, then it probably works. 
> ScriptBook isn’t going to test anything. I think Tonel works for Squeak. I think I probably goofed with the Bera stuff. Probably Pharo only. 
> Most of the specs for ScriptBook are soft. I have ideas about importing and exporting Json to disk, etc. 
> 
> I do know that since scripts fit so well in code and there are so many code repos that a dedicated server for Installer scripts doesn’t make much sense. 
> I know that I’m building something for myself, because I’ll probably never have any users. 
> I also know that as a 3rd party developer I never want to have any dealings with the Inbox/Trunk process. I think it made Squeak itself the only application. 
> And while it’s emphasis on conformity and peer review is good for the core language, its mentality is the opposite of the reason a lot of people (like me) hack in the first place. So if people think that every piece of code is trying to qualify for assimilation, then perhaps that’s an overreach? 
> 
> Chris 
> 
> Anthrax  - Got The Time
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=be7iNHw8QoQ
> 


More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list