Hey,

u:v: are common synonyms for x:y: in 3d software when it comes to texture coordinates: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UV_mapping
Various 3D-related packages rely on this being defined and since we don't have a "general 3d extensions" package I think it will be rather hard for this to find a new home somewhere else.

Best,
Tom
________________________________________
From: Squeak-dev <squeak-dev-bounces at lists.squeakfoundation.org> on behalf of Herbert König <herbertkoenig at gmx.net>
Sent: Sunday, December 8, 2019 10:52:22 AM
To: squeak-dev at lists.squeakfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [squeak-dev] Possible deprecations in Point and Collection

Hi all,


r:degrees: is polar u:v is x:y: sending new instead of basicNew.

Polar coordinates are important to me, I have no opinion about the other.


Cheers, Herbert


Am 07.12.2019 um 19:14 schrieb Tobias Pape:
>> On 07.12.2019, at 17:40, Thiede, Christoph <Christoph.Thiede at student.hpi.uni-potsdam.de> wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> may it be possible that the following methods are no longer in use and could be deprecated for the sake of simplicity?
>> Point
>> #u, #v
>> (class) #u:v:
> I don't think just because the base system does not use polar coordinates that it would be a good idea to drop support for them…
>
> -t
>
>> SequenceableCollection
>> #errorFirstObject:
>> #errorLastObject:
>>
>> Best,
>> Christoph
>
>