Hi Marcel,

On Thu, Jul 4, 2019 at 1:26 AM Marcel Taeumel <marcel.taeumel at hpi.de> wrote:

> Hi, there.
>
> Given such a method:
>
> Float >> #foobar
>    ^ #(NaN)
>
> Should this be true:
>
> (Float >> #foobar) hasLiteral: (Float bindingOf: #NaN)
>
> I think not...
>

I agree.   (Float >> #foobar) hasLiteral: #NaN should be true, but not the
bindingOf: variant.  However, in the UI it is helpful if the false positive
shows up because that symbol *could* be used in a query.  So IMO at some
level the UI ought to be using two queries, one for the binding and one for
the binding's key.


> Best,
> Marcel
>
>

-- 
_,,,^..^,,,_
best, Eliot
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20190704/96e2c417/attachment-0001.html>