I agree with Tobias and Subbu, random order makes the feature questionable.
Please try to write a TestCase to illustrate the expectations in case of
non sequenceable collections.

Le dim. 2 juin 2019 à 07:58, K K Subbu <kksubbu.ml at gmail.com> a écrit :

> On 02/06/19 12:25 AM, Chris Muller wrote:
> > The method only uses #do:, which is required of all Collections, so
> > it's not any less clear than #do: on those objects.
>
> Chris,
>
> #do: does yield a sequence but the order is not guaranteed to be same
> from one send to another.
>
> The provided test case for #joinSeparatedBy: assumed a particular
> sequence. When Christoph proposed to relax it for all Collections, the
> existing test cases will also have to change to avoid false fails.
>
> Regards .. Subbu
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20190603/ab563c72/attachment.html>