[squeak-dev] Some Win32 ClipboardInterpreter still use squeakToMac, why???

Yoshiki Ohshima Yoshiki.Ohshima at acm.org
Tue Jun 11 18:23:19 UTC 2019


On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 11:19 AM Tobias Pape <Das.Linux at gmx.de> wrote:

>
> [1]: this is the most amazing encoding "hack" I have seen, and I think
> that's actually why Unicode for codepoints <256 is the way it is: that
> latin1 strings are just that: valid unicode. I know it was not done
> _because_ of Squeak, but Andreas obviously saw then chance and took it.
>
>
The story was a bit more complicated, but we documented some ideas here:

http://www.vpri.org/pdf/ohshima_c5.pdf


-- 
-- Yoshiki
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20190611/0b102d29/attachment.html>


More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list