Héhé, I found older https://marc.info/?l=squeak-dev&m=123179608119480&w=2

Le ven. 17 mai 2019 à 19:47, Nicolas Cellier <
nicolas.cellier.aka.nice at gmail.com> a écrit :

> http://source.squeak.org/trunk/Compiler-nice.189.diff with the help of
> Eliot :)
>
> Le ven. 17 mai 2019 à 19:32, Nicolas Cellier <
> nicolas.cellier.aka.nice at gmail.com> a écrit :
>
>>
>>
>> Le ven. 17 mai 2019 à 19:20, Nicolas Cellier <
>> nicolas.cellier.aka.nice at gmail.com> a écrit :
>>
>>> Hi Torge,
>>> considering that I'm probably the one who made cascading work for
>>> inlined messages, I'm happy enough with your suggestion ;)
>>> https://marc.info/?l=squeak-dev&m=123180721604241&w=2
>>>
>>> I thought I once proposed some Compiler changes to make the cacaded
>>> inlined message still optimized, but I can't find them anymore.
>>> It was rejected as overkill (two many changes for so few value)
>>>
>> if couse, it was not two, but many more, too many
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Le ven. 17 mai 2019 à 18:08, Torge Husfeldt <torge.husfeldt at gmx.de> a
>>> écrit :
>>>
>>>> Hi Subbu,
>>>> see, I forgot about the good old simple parantheses. As I said, rusty.
>>>> I’d say, if we don’t reach unanimity regarding the new selectors, this
>>>> shortcut should fit the bill for your initial request?
>>>>
>>>> Von meinem iPhone gesendet
>>>>
>>>> > Am 17.05.2019 um 13:02 schrieb K K Subbu <kksubbu.ml at gmail.com>:
>>>> >
>>>> > This also works:
>>>> >
>>>> > ('isBoolean' beginsWith: 'is') ifTrue: [Display flash: World bounds];
>>>> yourself
>>>> >
>>>> > Regards .. Subbu
>>>> >
>>>> >> On 16/05/19 8:43 PM, Torge Husfeldt wrote:
>>>> >> Hi Nico,
>>>> >> I'm convinced this only works without the extra [] value because you
>>>> chose a special selector. For keyword-selector it should go to "self".
>>>> >> Which part exactly is not optimized? The "ifTrue:" has a special
>>>> handling in the bytecode complier, and iirc yourself is also not "actually
>>>> sent".
>>>> >> Cdlt
>>>> >> Torge
>>>> >>> On 16.05.19 17:08, Nicolas Cellier wrote:
>>>> >>> Hi,
>>>> >>> Ah yes, it works, no need for extra [] value
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>     (3 > 2) ifTrue: [Transcript cr; show: 'bingo!']; yourself
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> The code is not optimized, but it works.
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> Le jeu. 16 mai 2019 à 16:52, Torge Husfeldt <torge.husfeldt at gmx.de
>>>> <mailto:torge.husfeldt at gmx.de>> a écrit :
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>    Salut Nico,
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>    please excuse if my squeak knowlege is a bit rusty, but wouldn't
>>>> >>>    this do the job:
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>    self findlast: [:each |
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>    [self testSomeConditionFor: each] value ifTrue:[self
>>>> >>>    performSomeAction:each]; yourself.
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>    ].
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>    Just an idea. And very sad that I have to wrap the condition in a
>>>> >>>    block, but I guess othewise the recipient for "yourself" would be
>>>> >>>    "self"
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>>    On 14.05.19 17:02, Nicolas Cellier wrote:
>>>> >>>>    Oups, my example was a bit stupid because findLast: loop stops
>>>> at
>>>> >>>>    first true, but you get my intention...
>>>> >>>>    Replace with select:/reject: or provide a whenFalse: side
>>>> effect...
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>>    Le mar. 14 mai 2019 à 16:23, Nicolas Cellier
>>>> >>>>    <nicolas.cellier.aka.nice at gmail.com
>>>> >>>>    <mailto:nicolas.cellier.aka.nice at gmail.com>> a écrit :
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>>        Hi,
>>>> >>>>        From time to time, I need to perform some additional action
>>>> >>>>        (side effect) when a boolean is true, but preserve that
>>>> >>>>        boolean as return value.
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>>        Here is a pseudo example:
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>>            self findLast: [:each |
>>>> >>>>                | conforming |
>>>> >>>>                conforming := self testSomeConditionFor: each.
>>>> >>>>                conforming
>>>> >>>>                    ifTrue:
>>>> >>>>                        [ "found one, do some side effect before
>>>> >>>>        searching next"
>>>> >>>>                        self performSomeAction: each ].
>>>> >>>>                 conforming ].
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>>        Or shorter, but I dislike the redundant true:
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>>            self findLast: [:each |
>>>> >>>>                (self testSomeConditionFor: each)
>>>> >>>>                    and:
>>>> >>>>                        [ "found one, do some side effect before
>>>> >>>>        searching next"
>>>> >>>>                        self performSomeAction: each.
>>>> >>>>                        true ]].
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>>        What i seek is even shorter:
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>>            self findLast: [:each |
>>>> >>>>                (self testSomeConditionFor: each)
>>>> >>>>                    whenTrue:
>>>> >>>>                        [ "found one, do some side effect before
>>>> >>>>        searching next"
>>>> >>>>                        self performSomeAction: each ]].
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>>        Of course, we would have companions whenFalse:,
>>>> >>>>        whenTrue:whenFalse:...
>>>> >>>>        Would you buy it?
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20190517/f0bce0f3/attachment.html>